• Home
  • Thoughts
  • News
  • Meditations
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Contact Us
Menu

Extinct

The Philosophy of Palaeontology Blog
  • Home
  • Thoughts
  • News
  • Meditations
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Contact Us

Sixth PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Soon (Brunet, Yoshida, Currie)

July 2, 2024

There’s a new PhilPaleo “Roadshow” talk starting soon! The speakers will be Tyler Brunet, Yoshi Yoshida and Adrian Currie, and they will be discussing the merits of speculative  evolution. Title, abstract and link below…

Counterfactual Natural History, Speculative Evolution & the Minimal Rewrite Rule

We argue that speculative and artistic approaches to future and paleobiological evolution have significant epistemic merits. Speculative evolution, paradigmatically in Dougal Dixon’s The New Dinosaurs (1988) and After Man (1981) is in the business of imagining and representing possible evolutionary paths, as to some extent is paleoart more generally. Although their intentions and evidential bases are often different, we see both speculative evolution and paleoart as forms of scientifically informed and potentially informing artistic practice. These practices are often criticized  as failed predictions or unjustified counterfactuals. We argue that these criticisms can be understood as relying on a strong form of the “minimal rewrite rule”—a principle in human history that says that our counterfactual explanations should assume only changes that are as minimal as possible. However, a strong reading of the minimal rewrite rule is appropriate only if speculative evolution really is in the business of telling us what would happen. We argue instead that speculative evolution is in the business of exploring what could happen under interesting antecedent constraints—constraints that need not be minimal to be epistemically fruitful. In either case, paleoart or speculative, we argue that the best interpretation of narrative and artistic practices places them on a spectrum somewhere between employing ‘could’ and ‘would’ counterfactuals, differing only in the extent or kind of imagined rewrite required. We take this to support the epistemic value of these artistic practices and provide a more nuanced basis for discussing the relationships (positive or negative) between their aesthetic and epistemic qualities. 

Join Zoom Meeting
https://Universityofexeter.zoom.us/j/91000214741?pwd=OFrSDDxdPuM7yrUMYlmwe4qQcxZbYQ.1

← Penultimate PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Tomorrow (Matt Brewer)Fifth PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Tomorrow (6/25): Jan Forsman (Iowa) →

Recent News

Featured
May 20, 2025
Naw, F**k That
May 20, 2025
May 20, 2025
May 15, 2025
Not as Alien as it Looks
May 15, 2025
May 15, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
Philosophy and Paleontology Online Talk (April 2)
Mar 26, 2025
Mar 26, 2025
Dec 13, 2024
"Exploding the Big Bang," or revenge of the first antinomy?
Dec 13, 2024
Dec 13, 2024
Jul 22, 2024
Penultimate PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Tomorrow (Matt Brewer)
Jul 22, 2024
Jul 22, 2024
Jul 2, 2024
Sixth PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Soon (Brunet, Yoshida, Currie)
Jul 2, 2024
Jul 2, 2024
Jun 24, 2024
Fifth PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Tomorrow (6/25): Jan Forsman (Iowa)
Jun 24, 2024
Jun 24, 2024
Jun 18, 2024
Fourth PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Today: Alison McConwell (Massachusetts Lowell)
Jun 18, 2024
Jun 18, 2024
Jun 11, 2024
Third PhilPaleo "Roadshow" Talk Today: Marilynn Johnson (USD)
Jun 11, 2024
Jun 11, 2024
Jun 10, 2024
PhD opportunity working on Charles Lyell's notebooks
Jun 10, 2024
Jun 10, 2024

Powered by Squarespace